Xref: utzoo comp.robotics:666 sci.space:27479 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!clyde.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!milo.mcs.anl.gov!sirius.mcs.anl.gov!winans From: winans@sirius.mcs.anl.gov (John Winans) Newsgroups: comp.robotics,sci.space Subject: Re: Request for Feedback on Proposed Lunar Analog Robotics Contest Message-ID: <1991Feb5.202021.2886@mcs.anl.gov> Date: 5 Feb 91 20:20:21 GMT References: <767@sousa.enet.dec.com> Sender: news@mcs.anl.gov Organization: Argonne National Laboratory, Chicago, Illinois Lines: 30 Nntp-Posting-Host: sirius.mcs.anl.gov I have been reading this thread with some interest. And have wondered about the remote-controlled "categories". The origional note mentioned the use of cellular phones and ham radio to communicate with the robots. Since we all know that radio works and we COULD use it if we wanted to pay for it, why not allow (or create a category) that would allow a looooooooonnggg wire to be used instead? Sure it's sort of a wimpy way out, but I'm sure there are others like myself that would like to enter this thing, but don't feel like dealing with (and paying for) the radio stuff. (Those others might even have time to finish building their machine in time as well :-( ) This would also allow us poor folks to use video. And it would also eliminate any argument for letting people within direct sight of their vehicle when controlling it. Hmmm If there was SOME standardization in the format used, the sponsor of the event could also provide an error generator that could inject errors into the communication system (like interrupt video signals, pop bit errors into the standard serial communications formats etc...). This might even up the competition a little bit as well. -- ! John Winans Advanced Computing Research Facility ! ! winans@mcs.anl.gov Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois ! ! ! !"The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away"-- Tom Waits !