Xref: utzoo talk.politics.misc:63483 talk.politics.mideast:33594 trial.talk.politics.peace:32 alt.desert-storm:6665
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!magnolia.engin.umich.edu!bombach
From: bombach@caen.engin.umich.edu (Paul Matthew Bombach)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast,trial.talk.politics.peace,alt.conspiracy,alt.desert-storm
Subject: Re: The Nuclear Option
Keywords: mass destruction, anyone?
Message-ID: <1991Feb11.172446.7039@engin.umich.edu>
Date: 11 Feb 91 17:24:46 GMT
References: <1991Feb7.025838.13793@panix.uucp> <1991Feb9.075438.17779@alembic.acs.com> <1991Feb11.023449.17583@ddsw1.MCS.COM>
Sender: news@engin.umich.edu (CAEN Netnews)
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Lines: 13

>
>I think that in the event of chemical warfare attacks, the US might
>very well drop a tactical nuke on one of the Republican Guard units.
>I'm pretty sure the U.S. population would support such a move - I'm
>not so sure of world opinion, but I suspect the reaction would be
>negative, but not overwhelmingly so.

As my mother used to say "Two wrongs don't make a right."

If the U.S. dropped a tactical nuke, I thinked G.Bush should be tried as a
war criminal.

Paul Bombach