Newsgroups: comp.archives
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!ox.com!emv
From: frank@croton.nyo.dec.com (Frank Wortner)
Subject: [ultrix] Re: gcc vs. cc
Message-ID: <1991Feb18.014832.13831@ox.com>
Followup-To: comp.unix.ultrix
Sender: emv@ox.com (Edward Vielmetti)
Reply-To: frank@croton.nyo.dec.com (Frank Wortner)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
References: <16392@milton.u.washington.edu> <1924@riscy.enet.dec.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 1991 01:48:32 GMT
Approved: emv@ox.com (Edward Vielmetti)
X-Original-Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix

Archive-name: gnu/gcc/osf-gcc/1991-02-14
Archive: gatekeeper.dec.com:/pub/GNU/osf/gcc-osf-1.9.2.13.tar.Z [16.1.0.2]
Original-posting-by: frank@croton.nyo.dec.com (Frank Wortner)
Original-subject: Re: gcc vs. cc
Reposted-by: emv@ox.com (Edward Vielmetti)

In article <16392@milton.u.washington.edu>, mattf@cac.washington.edu
(Matthew Freedman) writes:

> Does anybody have any opinions about whether or not it is worthwhile to
> use gcc instead of the standard Ultrix 4.0 cc compiler?

No real opinion, but if you do want to use gcc, you should probably consider
the OSF-enhanced version.  It has debugger support --- the "-g" option works.

It's available from gatekeeper.dec.com (and probably several other archives).
Look in pub/GNU/osf.

					Frank