Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!ucivax!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucsd!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: dmr@csli.stanford.edu (Daniel M. Rosenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Wanted: Recommendations For Small Key-System
Message-ID: <telecom11.119.9@eecs.nwu.edu>
Date: 16 Feb 91 00:07:47 GMT
Sender: news@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
Organization: World Otherness Ministries
Lines: 23
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 119, Message 9 of 11


In <74655@bu.edu.bu.edu> john@zygot.ati.com (John Higdon) writes:

> Four modems each answer a particular line
> each and there is a FAX machine. If a particular modem has not reset
> and does not answer, there is a delayed ringing sequence programed
> into the switch to try another after one ring and so on down the line.
> This is set up in a circular arrangement, which the Panasonic is
> easily capable of doing. This arrangement also allows a modem to use
> other lines, such as WATS, for outgoing calls by simply putting a
> different trunk group access code in the dial script.  

We have a 1232 as well, but I don't see how it's physically possible
for you to call-forward-no answer CO calls. Perhaps your modems get
called from the DISA card? But I thought the call-forward-no
answer/busy works only on extension-to-extension calls. If that's not
true, I'd be psyched to figure out what you did to make yours work
otherwise. We're paying a $40/month premium to the University phone
department for the privilidge of CO-hunting.


# Daniel M. Rosenberg         Stanford Univ CSLI      Opinions here are my own
# dmr@csli.stanford.edu  {apple,ucbvax}!labrea!csli!dmr  BIT:dmr%csli@stanford