Xref: utzoo comp.dsp:1273 sci.math:15182
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!njin!njitgw!hertz.njit.edu!jfa0522
From: jfa0522@hertz.njit.edu (john f andrews ece)
Newsgroups: comp.dsp,sci.math
Subject: Re: resampling problem
Message-ID: <2341@njitgw.njit.edu>
Date: 18 Feb 91 13:57:37 GMT
References: <1991Feb13.234510.22488@nuchat.sccsi.com> <11145@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1991Feb16.160801.7117@nuchat.sccsi.com>
Sender: news@njitgw.njit.edu
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.
Lines: 26

In article <1991Feb16.160801.7117@nuchat.sccsi.com> steve@nuchat.sccsi.com (Steve Nuchia) writes:
>In <11145@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> jbuck@galileo.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck) writes:
>>If you have available the exact x values where the samples are taken,
...stuff deleted
>>You can then resample the continuous-time signal at your desired rate.
>
>Part 2 of my problem is to compute the samples directly, rather than
>go through an intermediate.  Particularly not an analog intermediate.

Just for clarity I would like to point out that resampling does not require 
an analog intermediate but simply resampling of the resulting digital 
output...

BTW, can anyone recall the discussion on applying similar interpolation 
to a sampled EKG some time ago? I believe someone wanted to reconstruct a
complete EKG waveform from sampled data, and was actually testing these 
digital techniques and reporting results here?  Perhaps I am incorrect but
I beleive many of these ideas were tossed about then ...

  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
john f andrews                SYSOP           The Biomedical Engineering BBS
    24 hrs                300/1200/2400               (201) 596-5679
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNET jfa0522@hertz.njit.edu    LabRat@faraday.njit.edu    CIS 73710,2600
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------