Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!pdn!tscs!tct!chip
From: chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Why have xxx_t typedef names (was Re: Is typedef char BUFFER[20] legal?)
Message-ID: <27BC189F.637F@tct.uucp>
Date: 15 Feb 91 17:21:34 GMT
References: <23134@netcom.COM> <3377@unisoft.UUCP> <1991Feb14.040136.27388@dirtydog.ima.isc.com>
Organization: Teltronics/TCT, Sarasota, FL
Lines: 8

According to karl@ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer):
>A simpler solution would be to make typedefs idempotent, like macros.

For what it's worth, this solution is used in C++.
-- 
Chip Salzenberg at Teltronics/TCT     <chip@tct.uucp>, <uunet!pdn!tct!chip>
 "I want to mention that my opinions whether real or not are MY opinions."
             -- the inevitable William "Billy" Steinmetz