Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!munnari.oz.au!brolga!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!zeus!s64421 From: s64421@zeus.usq.EDU.AU (house ron) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Power C Message-ID: Date: 15 Feb 91 12:04:20 GMT References: <1450@crpmks.UUCP> <5437@trantor.harris-atd.com> <1991Feb11.104733.18042@tygra.UUCP> Lines: 18 dave@tygra.UUCP (David Conrad) writes: >Hmm. I recently received an advert for Power C. They compared it with >Turbo C 1.5 and Microsoft C 4.0. The latest TC is TC++ 1.0 which was to >have been TC 3.0, and the latest MSC is, I believe, 6.0. > >BTW: Power C compared favorably in both speed of benchmarks and size of >executables with TC 1.5 and MSC 4.0. Suprise, suprise. > >Would you buy a used car from these people? If it looked good and cost $19.95, yes. Just what do some people want? -- Regards, Ron House. (s64421@zeus.usq.edu.au) (By post: Info Tech, U.C.S.Q. Toowoomba. Australia. 4350)