Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Feedback to the Forth Interest Group Message-ID: <2351.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us> Date: 18 Feb 91 02:00:12 GMT Organization: (n.) to be organized. But that's not important right now. Lines: 76 Date: 02-14-91 (12:59) Number: 1164 of 1166 (Echo) To: DENNIS RUFFER Refer#: 1140 From: JACK WOEHR Read: NO Subj: FEEDBACK TO THE FORTH INT Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE Conf: FORTH (58) Read Type: GENERAL (+) -> I was actually looking forward to a vote this last year. Although I -> was not on the Nominating Committee, it would have seemed kind of -> pointless for them to nominate someone who was going to submit a -> petition. Let me ask it this way Jack. If the Nominating Committee -> has nominated you and you joined the Board with no vote from the -> members, would still be using all the tastless names you have -> attributed to the Directors so far? I can tell you that the tables -> could have been turned very easily. Actually, you and John Hall tried several times to persuade me to accept such a nomination and I refused it as dishonorable under the circumstances. I commend to your recollection many conversations we all had on GEnie, as well as ask you to query John Hall on a conversation he and I had on the phone last July. As I explained before, an organization that is losing its members due to its inability to *act* needs some fresh, outside input of the sort that is not likely to be provided by hand-picked successors. That type of system failed in East Germany and the Soviet Union, and it is failing in FIG. -> So, yes we did add two new people to the Board of Directors. Dr. -> C.H. Ting and Dave Petty are now part of this group that you feel -> does not know how to do their jobs. I for one, hope they have thick -> enough skins to handle the abuse. The suggestion that I would intentionally verbally abuse my good friend of many years, Dr. Ting, I take you to have meant facetiously. If the Board should attempt to use that estimable scholar's good name as a shield for their incompetence it will only discourage any attempt to revitalize the international FIG organization. It has been said, "FIG started in Silicon Valley and for the core members, if it only survived in Silicon Valley they would be happy." I think this is true, and that the Board doesn't care if FIG survives as an international organization. This is what their actions say, and actions speak louder than platitudes. Come to think of it FIG hasn't even been offering us platitudes for some time! The appointment of David Petty offers some hope. David is nothing if not a hellraiser! However, I do recall that when Jack Brown and I were both at the August meeting of X3J14 Jack studiously avoided discussion of my candidacy for the board (at a time when the petition signatures were not yet in) and buttonholed Dave Petty about the Board off to the side. So it's clear that what the Board is looking for is someone the cut of whose jib they like, which may mean more of the same failure-oriented management. Dr. Ting's organizational skills are very strong, but against that lump of human inertia that is the Board of Directors of the Forth Interest Group, he has his work cut out for him. If you had made Ting the president in place of the officious Mr. Reiling, it would have offered more chances for success. But success isn't what FIG has been about, not since they dropped the ball on the annual conventions. =jax= NET/Mail : RCFB Golden, CO (303) 278-0364 VESTA & Denver FIG for Forth! <<<>>> ----- This message came from GEnie via willett. You cannot Reply to the author using email. Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, whatever). Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us or uunet!willett!dwp