Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: ANS TC Magnet for Cont. Ref. Set
Message-ID: <2362.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 18 Feb 91 02:00:37 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 20

Category 10,  Topic 21
Message 69        Fri Feb 15, 1991
F.SERGEANT [Frank]           at 23:39 CST
 
 > We don't chuck Newtonian mechanics because it ultimately fails to 
 > work in relativistic situations.
 .
 For another viewpoint on this, readers might want to check out  *Einstein
Plus Two* by Petr Beckmann (212pp, $36ppd, The Golem Press,  Box 1342,
Boulder, CO 80306) or the journal *Galilean Electrodynamics*  (sample copy
probably available through Golem Press).   These suggest  ways that Newtonian
mechanics *can* explain all the observations that  are usually thought to
require the Einstein theory. Beckmann is also  the author of *A History of
Pi*, which is a very entertaining book.
 -- Frank
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You cannot Reply to the author
using email.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, whatever).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us or uunet!willett!dwp