Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!pbs.org!TALOS!jerry From: jerry@TALOS.UUCP (Jerry Gitomer) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: What should the Standard include? Message-ID: <1151@TALOS.UUCP> Date: 20 Feb 91 14:59:47 GMT References: <2363.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us> <8485126@harvee.UUCP> Organization: NPRI, Alexandria VA Lines: 43 esj@harvee.UUCP (Eric S Johansson) writes: :In article <2363.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us :(ForthNet articles from GEnie) writes: :: :: Category 10, Topic 30 :: Message 97 Sat Feb 16, 1991 :: B.RODRIGUEZ2 [Brad] at 16:23 EST :: :: From Mitch Bradley: :: :: : The problem with criteria, either "necessary" or "sufficient", :: : is that there is no mechanism for either consistently applying :: : or enforcing them. :: :: I couldn't have said it better myself! However, this is not a problem with :: criteria per se -- it's a problem with the TC. :: :How can you claim this is a problem with the TC? "necessary" and "sufficient" :are ambigious terms. For example, would you go into an auto :mechanics shop, hand him (or her) your car and say "do what ever is :necessary and send me the bill." I think not (otherwise I want to be :your auto mechanic :-) Unfortunately, twice I have had to hand my body to surgeons and say "do whatever is necessary and send my insurance company the bill" :-( :When ever any organization is working with ambigious criteria, you :get inconsistent results. This is true for contracts, :standards, agreements, or any situation where group sez "we will do this" :and does not define "this". The TC, like any other standards group, represents a multitude of interests. As a result ambiguous criteria cannot be avoided and the resulting standard tends to be the least offensive compromise. No one likes it, but without a strong defacto standard supported by an industry giant, we shouldn't anticipate anything "better". -- Jerry Gitomer at National Political Resources Inc, Alexandria, VA USA I am apolitical, have no resources, and speak only for myself. Ma Bell (703)683-9090 (UUCP: ...{uupsi,vrdxhq}!pbs!npri6!jerry