Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!news.cs.indiana.edu!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!scrolls.wharton.upenn.edu!catone
From: catone@scrolls.wharton.upenn.edu (Tony Catone)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: (none)
Message-ID: <37914@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 19 Feb 91 21:54:47 GMT
References: <25726@adm.brl.mil> <11733@j.cc.purdue.edu> <25943@dime.cs.umass.edu>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 14

In article <25943@dime.cs.umass.edu> eli@smectos.CS.UMASS.EDU (Eli Brandt) writes:
>
>Incidentally, I have never seen anybody discuss interrupts in a radix
>other than 16.

Wrong!  Norton's books, various editions, among others, flip flops between
bases 10 and 16.  *Lot's* of code I've seen does the same thing; of course,
most of it is written by grad students, but that's a gripe for another day.
And as for annoying, your tone *really* is.  People still do things that
you have not seen.

- Tony
  catone@desci.wharton.upenn.edu
  catone@dsl.cis.upenn.edu