Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!emory!hubcap!rbe
From: rbe@yrloc.ipsa.reuter.COM (Robert Bernecky)
Newsgroups: comp.parallel
Subject: Re: Ease of programming versus efficiency
Message-ID: <13122@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Date: 14 Feb 91 14:14:33 GMT
References: <13066@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Sender: fpst@hubcap.clemson.edu
Reply-To: rbe@yrloc.ipsa.reuter.COM (Robert Bernecky)
Organization: I P Sharp Associates, Toronto
Lines: 16
Approved: parallel@hubcap.clemson.edu

The flaw in your reasoning is that you make the assumption that you
cannot have programs which are both efficient AND maintainable.

If you are writing in stone-age languages such as Fortran, even
Fortran 8x,90,9x (pick your value of x), then your assumption is
correct: The language is too crude and primitive to meet both needs.

What IS needed is a language (or languages) which reflect the way we
think: Languages which are concise, which have few rules, and which
have simple rules. 

Once applicative languages such as J have efficient compilers developed
for them, they might be able to be the cake you can have and eat.

Bob Bernecky
Snake Island Research Inc.