Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!unido!fauern!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1
From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: A3000UX vs. Sun Sparc
Keywords: comparison?
Message-ID: <1991Feb17.053119.26764@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: 17 Feb 91 05:31:19 GMT
References: <44277@ut-emx.uucp>
Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News)
Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 27

In article <44277@ut-emx.uucp> sjk@ut-emx.uucp (bob) writes:
>
>
>So, can anyone start an intelligent debate comparing 3000UX (200MB
>drive and 8+MB RAM) vs. bottom line Sparcstation? Forgive me if
>this was done before, but I haven't seen it, yet. 

	One main difference is that the low end Sparcs have no HD
and are unexpandable. They are meant to be added directly onto
another network. The A3000UX is much more flexible in those
areas. Of course, if you are just going to add an NFS connection
onto your machine and don't need any disk drive locally, the
priorities change a bit.

>Thanks,
>Scot
>sjk@emx.utexas.edu
>
>Yow, am I President yet?!  - Zippy


	-- Ethan


Q:	What's the definition of a Quayle?

A:	Two right wings and no backbone.