Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!sjk
From: sjk@ut-emx.uucp (Phil Alvin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: A3000UX vs. Sun Sparc
Keywords: comparison?
Message-ID: <44281@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 17 Feb 91 08:43:39 GMT
References: <44277@ut-emx.uucp> <1991Feb17.053119.26764@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin; Austin, Texas
Lines: 14

Ethan Solomita writes:
> 
> 	One main difference is that the low end Sparcs have no HD
> and are unexpandable. They are meant to be added directly onto
> another network. 

True, but I believe they all contain a SCSI port allowing for the
addition of any SCSI drive.  And with something like a University
License, this disc can be filled with Sun software,  making it a
standalone.  Thus, I believe a useful comparison would be a 3000UX
to this type of Sparc configuration.

scot
sjk@emx.utexas.edu