Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!infonode!hychejw From: hychejw@infonode.ingr.com (Jeff W. Hyche) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: How to beat a NeXT Message-ID: <1991Feb19.142411.17216@infonode.ingr.com> Date: 19 Feb 91 14:24:11 GMT References: <7692@sugar.hackercorp.com> <481@cronos.metaphor.com> <1991Feb11.023952.19951@NCoast.ORG> <1991Feb12.043247.6171@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <1991Feb13.161930.4861@cc.helsinki.fi> Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL Lines: 28 jalkio@cc.helsinki.fi writes: >Add to this that NeXT has the DSP and 16-bit CD-quality stereo-audio, >Oh, you can't have EVERYTHING for $3000. You just have to decide _what_ >you need most. (Amiga, for example doesn't really have sound on $3000 >range - only because of the insufficent quality for anything more than >games.) Okay I have tried to stay out off all flame wars reguarding my computer is better than yours. Over the years I have found that all compters have there place in the world. But I have to point something out here. The Amiga does have 8 bit sound, that is true, and so does the MacII. So the NeXT has 16 bit audio, thats nice. But what good is it? The people that I know who do real work in sound editing and producing all use Mac II, Amiga and Atari STs, and you know why they do. Simple, they edit the sound on the computer and send it trought a MIDI port to a dedacated instrument. No one in their right mind is gonna use a computers built in sound chips, at least not a Pro. Now does MIDI ports exist for the NeXT, is sound manuplating software there? Most of the people I know use MacII and Amigas and non that I know use the NeXT, hell most of them didn't know what it was or had even heard of Stevie Jobs. Reason simple because it doesn't have MIDI or the software to support it. -- // Jeff Hyche There can be only one! \\ // Usenet: hychejw@infonode.ingr.com \X/ Freenet: ap255@po.CWRU.Edu