Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!agate!darkstar!saturn.ucsc.edu!mcgowen From: mcgowen@saturn.ucsc.edu (Richard McGowen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.games Subject: Re: Run (don't walk) to your store. Lemmings has been released. Message-ID: <12591@darkstar.ucsc.edu> Date: 20 Feb 91 02:01:02 GMT References: <1991Feb18.051008.11300@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <52197@cornell.UUCP> <2323@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk> Sender: usenet@darkstar.ucsc.edu Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz Lines: 68 I know this subject has been beat to death but I still don't understand why psygnosis thinks that non-amiga dos format is going to stop piracy. It seems especially silly for the US version. I have heard that almost any European game, especially ones by psygnosis, are available on pirate boards in the US before the commercial version has even been released here. And since it seems that time and time again people post here about the illegal versions working on more systems and being hd-installable as well as less harsh on ones disk drive, I really fail to understand psygnosis' feelings that harsh copy protection is going to help their sales when the pirate version is actually better. I do not condone piracy, but I am trying to point out an inconsistancy in the logic of software companies, in not viewing things from the point of the user. On a side note: The prevalence of people viewing things from only one side is disturbing. IE The people in power feel that drugs are a bad thing and therefore we must make them illegal. This however drives the prices up. Now suppose we have a person that tries heroin, and decides he really likes it, in fact, he becomes an addict. However, since drugs are illegal and their prices are high, he has to steal to support his habit. Now most people would agree that theft is an unacceptable means of supporting a heroin habit, so therefore the addict is a bad person and should be punished. They fail to look at it from the side of the addict. He has to support his habit, just as you or I have to eat, and his drive to obtain his drug is probably stronger than most urges a non-addict feels. Therefore does he have a choice if theft is the only means of supporting his habit. However, this has a bad side effect of causing harm and anguish to the innocent people from whom he steals. I feel that if you look at both sides, the side of the person being robbed as well as the side of the addict you will see that there needs to be a solution that falls somewhere between punishment of the addict and the theft of property/money from innocent people. The solution should be one in which neither is harmed. It would be wonderful if the addict could quit, and he may very well want to, but might not be able to. Therefore, we should try to help him quit or offer another out other than theft. Much in the same way, the software companies see software theft as harmful as it very well is. The thief is harming their company as well as other users who follow the law. This may not seem the same as the case of the heorin addict but let me add one little twist, suppose that heorin was legal, like software, but its price was so high that some people could afford it while others could not. Hmm, now the picture becomes clearer. Therefore we need a solution in the middle, one where neither the software companies, the legitimate users, nor the people pirating software are hurt. We need to find a way so people who pay for software do not get crippled versions (nor perfectly working versions that have any annoyances related to copy protection) and people do not copy software. I admit that coming up with a solution that is in the middle will require a lot of work and I can not think of one right off the top of my head, however, copy protection is not the way though. Closing thought: +-> many people who would buy games that are otherwise wonderful are not doing | so SOLELY because of the copy protection ----> which means that fewer copies | are sold ----> higher prices and better pirate versions ----> more | piracy ----> more copy protection so --+ | | +--------------------------------------------+ COME ON COMPANIES, lets break this cycle. -- Richard McGowen "Men can't deal with commitment. They're afraid they'll get married and then meet the woman of their dreams at the reception." --Carrie Snow