Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu!news From: smsmith@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M. Smith) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Ultrastor 12F vs. Adaptec 2322D--which is better? Message-ID: <1991Feb17.041725.13430@magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu> Date: 17 Feb 91 04:17:25 GMT Sender: news@magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu Distribution: na Organization: The Ohio State University Lines: 20 Originator: smsmith@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu I will soon be buying a 486-25 from Gateway and I've been offered the Ultrastor 12F ESDI 32k caching controller from Gateway for $175. I was going to get the Adaptec 2322D ESDI 64k caching controller for $163 through mail order, so I am wondering if the Ultrastor would be a better buy; it would be more *convenient* (warranty, tech support) to pay the extra $12 for the Ultrastor *if* it is as reliable as the Adaptec. I already have all the specs on the Adaptec, but since I don't know much about the Ultrastor I thought I would ask the net. Any good/bad experiences? Formating problems? Compatibility? P.S. I will be using it with a Micropolis 1654-7 ESDI (160 MEG) drive. Stephen M. Smith \ + / ,,@ ircc.ohio-state. \ + / {7%*@,..":27g)-=,#*:.#,/6&1*.4-,l@#9:-) " edu> \ + / BTW, WYSInaWYG \ + / --witty.saying.ARC