Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!psuecl!tgm
From: tgm@ecl.psu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: Grammar Checker
Message-ID: <1991Feb18.150647.744@ecl.psu.edu>
Date: 18 Feb 91 19:06:46 GMT
References: <1991Feb14.025044.2809@cs.dal.ca> <4052@scott.ed.ac.uk> <16619@milton.u.washington.edu>
Organization: Engineering Computer Lab, Pennsylvania State University
Lines: 22

In article <16619@milton.u.washington.edu>, bose@milton.u.washington.edu (Rob Olsen) writes:
>>> 1. Correct Grammar (from Lifetree Software)
>>> 2. Sensible Grammar (from Sensible Software)
>>> 3. MacProof (from Lexpertise)
>
>>Only the first of these is actually a grammar checker.  As a colleague
>>said of "Sensible Grammar" on exploring the package:  "it would seem
>>that the only sensible grammar is no grammar at all".
>
>>The only other Mac grammar checker is Grammatik, but Correct Grammar
>>is far superior.
>
> I am thinking of buying a grammar checker.  For those of you who bought any
> grammar check, could you tell me how you like them?  Thanks
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> There is no place like home.

I am using an older version of Correct Grammar, and I think it's pretty good.

--Tom Moertel
thor@chopin.psu.edu
tgm@eclu.psu.edu