Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!shelby!rutgers!psuvax1!news From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: NeXT | I love my SE (was:68040 for the Mac? Message-ID: Date: 17 Feb 91 19:07:37 GMT References: <1991Feb16.020056.11742@NCoast.ORG> <1e3G7w*o@cs.psu.edu> <3287@ux.acs.umn.edu> <13469@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet) Organization: Penn State Computer Science Lines: 44 In-Reply-To: krk@cs.purdue.EDU's message of 17 Feb 91 16:49:24 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: client7.cs.psu.edu In article <13469@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> krk@cs.purdue.EDU (Kevin Kuehl) writes: Or you could look at it this way -- for $700 more than a IIfx you can get a pair of IIsi's. This allows two people to use computers instead of only one. I can't claim I came up with this idea, I got it from the Facilities Manager at Purdue. :-) When you look at it that way, the IIsi looks pretty good. Actually, it's not too bad. Apple didn't cripple it by limiting it to 8 megs of RAM? It does have the 030 so virtual memory will come with 7.0. As for the FPU, oh well. Word 4 will run just as fast. Not necessarily. If you don't need (or even want) Unix, a slow windowing system and need expandability and hand-holding (not all of us are technoweebs), you would be best to look somewhere else than NeXT. Expandability and hand-holding are where I think the IBM machines really shine compared to the rest of the market. :-( What's with this I don't want Unix? I want preemptive multitasking, networking, virtual memory and memory protection. I will use OS/2, if and when they ever finished it. I'm not that religous about the machine I use. >not a 15mip machine running DOS. And even if the NeXT was more power >than you needed, why pay the same amount of money for a computer that >is less powerful? The age old drum-beat of NeXT users: Unix + MIPs = Power. Too bad the workstation users can't learn from the mainframe users. Ask them if the IBM mainframes provides the most brute CPU (well, except for the 3090). Unix + mips + Display Postscript + Interface Builder + Objective C + Networking = Increased Functionality The reason most Mac people don't understand this, and rightly so, is because the multitude of applications haven't arrived yet. Word Perfect and Lotus Improv were just released within the past month. Adobe Illustrator and Quark Xpress still haven't shipped. The 040 NeXT has only been shipping for two months. We're at the beginning of the NeXT "revolution"(for lack of a more applicable word). It will be more obvious in a year. -Mike