Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!clyde.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!cs.dal.ca!ug.cs.dal.ca!graham
From: graham@ug.cs.dal.ca (Michael Graham)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: MOVE DISCUSSION (was Re: Macs are great...but [Amigas are better?])
Message-ID: <1991Feb17.182333.12839@cs.dal.ca>
Date: 17 Feb 91 18:23:33 GMT
References: <7605@crash.cts.com> <1991Feb17.115850.3596@sics.se>
Sender: news@cs.dal.ca (USENET News)
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Lines: 17
Nntp-Posting-Host: ug.cs.dal.ca

In article <1991Feb17.115850.3596@sics.se> ollef@sics.se (Olle Furberg) writes:
>In <7605@crash.cts.com> djm@pro-odyssey.cts.com (David McDowell) writes:
>>The Amiga line could have been
>>the better computer than a Macintosh but the fact is Commodore didn't put much
>
>  Please move this discussion to alt.religion.computers, before we have
>another Amiga-Mac flame war here.

In the 2 yrs that I have been reading this group I have never seen a REAL
flame war where dedication to a machine outweighs rational thought. People
like you seem to chomp at the bit at the mention of another computer. Why?

mike
-- 
|         Michael Graham          |   We're two doctors...two big doctors -   |
|       graham@ug.cs.dal.ca       |   we're not imposters.  - Woody Allen     |
|        mgraham@ac.dal.ca        |                               Sleeper     |