Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!shelby!agate!ziploc!eps
From: eps@toaster.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Printer help
Message-ID: <1319@toaster.SFSU.EDU>
Date: 16 Feb 91 08:39:41 GMT
References: <1991Feb6.080032.18350@engin.umich.edu> <1991Feb13.211037.25446@investor.pgh.pa.us>
Reply-To: eps@cs.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott)
Distribution: na
Organization: San Francisco State University
Lines: 18

In article <1991Feb13.211037.25446@investor.pgh.pa.us>
	rbp@investor.pgh.pa.us (Bob Peirce #305) writes:
>I am told 1.0 is limited to 72 dpi.

150.  On the ImageWriter II, I found that higher resolutions
contributed little to legibility (since the dots are so large),
and slowed things down considerably.  Unfortunately, I lost my
chance to play with an ImageWriter LQ--the person I knew who
had one traded it with someone who wanted a wide carriage
printer.  :-(  Anyway, a "typical" 72x120dpi printer isn't
going to violate the terms of your license agreement.

>                                     However, 2.0 supposedly has much
>higher limits, well beyond what I am likely to need.

900.

					-=EPS=-