Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!shelby!agate!ziploc!eps From: eps@toaster.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: 4MB SIMMs from Chip Merchant: 4MBx9 yes 4MBx8 no Message-ID: <1326@toaster.SFSU.EDU> Date: 17 Feb 91 06:41:51 GMT References: <1324@toaster.SFSU.EDU> Reply-To: eps@cs.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott) Organization: San Francisco State University Lines: 39 I've been getting mail from people who are apparently confused about this posting. I am *not* mixing parity and non-parity SIMMs. 4 4MBx8 SIMMs from the same manufacturing lot, with no other memory installed, did not work. I tried both banks. Replacing *all* of them with 4MBx9 SIMMs *did* work, as does using only 1MBx8 SIMMs--which was the original configuration. What I ultimately want is 4 4MBx8 + 4 1MBx8 = 20MB non-parity. * * * End facts; begin opinions: There's no question that going from 8MB to 16MB yielded a dramatic performance improvement. The 8MB configuration was heavily paging. Even in non-GUI "console" mode, it was clear that 8MB barely cut it. With 16MB I could load two typical Applications with no apparent degradation; with a third it began paging to the 105MB, but no where near as badly as with 8MB RAM. But it's obvious when you "go virtual." Another 4MB should let me run one or two more concurrent apps and still impress tour groups. :-) Part of the "problem" is that so many of our users are used to working on "primitive" microcomputers where it takes lots of time to start an application, but it's then fully memory-resident, and "as fast as the machine will let it." With 8MB, the NextStation mostly sucks a thick milkshake through a very thin straw, with occasional bursts of the "15 screaming MIPS" it's supposed to show. Double that, and it pretty much lives up to the hype. The Quantum's a dog, though. BTW, we ordered our NextStation Color machines with 16MB RAM from the outset--we need them to be usable out of the box when they finally get here. -=EPS=-