Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!acad3.alaska.edu!ifjrs
From: ifjrs@acad3.alaska.edu (STANNARD JOHN R)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: 16 bit recording
Summary: who has experience with DigitalEars, Singular Solutions, Ariel
Keywords: 16 bit recording, DigitalEars, Singular Solutions, Ariel
Message-ID: <1991Feb18.101502.6940@ims.alaska.edu>
Date: 18 Feb 91 10:15:02 GMT
References: <1991Feb14.034911.10704@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: usenet@ims.alaska.edu (J Random USENET)
Reply-To: ifjrs@acad3.alaska.edu
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Alaska Fairbanks
Lines: 27
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4
Nntp-Posting-Host: acad3.alaska.edu

In article <1991Feb14.034911.10704@Neon.Stanford.EDU>, hitt@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Daniel Hitt) writes...
>As far as i know, there are three (3rd party) devices for recording
>16-bit sound (on the NeXT), DigitalEars, Singular Solutions, and Ariel.
> 
>Does anyone have any experience with these they'd wish to discuss?
>Has anyone used more than one and can make a comparison?
>Is any of them exceptionally bad or good?
>Are there others that i'm missing?
> 
>dan
>(hitt@neon.stanford.edu)


I, too, am having problems figuring out the differences among these
three that are in the Software and Peripherals Fall Catalog.

John


--

John Stannard
KL7JL@KL7JL	IFJRS@ACAD3.FAI.ALASKA.EDU	BITNET: IFJRS@ALASKA
kl7jl.ampr.org   "God is the Answer!"  "Oh?? ... er, ...What was the Question?"


--