Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!parc!mdixon
From: mdixon@parc.xerox.com (Mike Dixon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Notebook computers
Message-ID: <mdixon.666906987@thelonius>
Date: 18 Feb 91 19:56:27 GMT
References: <1089@kaos.MATH.UCLA.EDU> <1991Feb18.103052.7433@ims.alaska.edu>
Sender: news@parc.xerox.com
Distribution: na
Organization: Xerox PARC
Lines: 10

i don't get it.  why do so many people in this group seem to think that
NeXT would be uniquely qualified to build a new machine that would have
0% of its hardware or software in common with NeXT's existing product line?

yes, i'd be happy to have a machine running GO's software.
no, i don't see why NeXT should be the people to build it.

--

                                             .mike.