Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!cernvax!chx400!chx400!urz.unibas.ch!infocenter
From: infocenter@urz.unibas.ch
Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell
Subject: Re: Lantastic
Message-ID: <1991Feb16.115213.1375@urz.unibas.ch>
Date: 16 Feb 91 10:52:12 GMT
References: <5233@tekfdi.FDI.TEK.COM>
Followup-To: comp.sys.novell
Organization: University of Basel, Switzerland
Lines: 23

In article <5233@tekfdi.FDI.TEK.COM>, michaels@tekfdi.FDI.TEK.COM (Michael D. Smith) writes:

> Lantastic system is far better than Novell.
> 
> We are somewhat trapped into buying the Lantastic system,
> since this is what our "expert" recommends.  But I don't
> feel right about just taking his advice since he is obviously
> biased and because the Lantastic system will cost alot more.


of course your 'expert' is biased. Two things:

1  get information from journals, build your own meaning from datasheets etc.
   but don't forget one thing:
2. somebody has to manage your network. If it is the guy that knows 
   Lantastic ... use his knowledge, take it!


bye ....................................................................  Didi

******************************************************************************
*  Universitas Basiliensis                                       InfoCenter  *
******************************************************************************