Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!rochester!kodak!ispd-newsserver!ism.isc.com!ico!rcd
From: rcd@ico.isc.com (Dick Dunn)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Who's who
Summary: keeping it above-board
Message-ID: <1991Feb14.075838.15658@ico.isc.com>
Date: 14 Feb 91 07:58:38 GMT
References: <1991Feb11.184130.11321@jwt.UUCP> <1991Feb12.020625.6779@kithrup.COM> <1991Feb13.230331.16512@kithrup.COM>
Organization: Interactive Systems Corporation, Boulder, CO
Lines: 26

background:
> >>>Now, the question is, what do we do to protect ourselves in the meantime?
> >>Get SCO.  [...]
> >Please keep your mindless SCO chauvinism to yourself.

"> >>" was Sean, so sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:
> Gee, that's funny.  When people complain all about SCO's problems, and other
> people respond with "Get ISC or ESIX," I don't see you complaining about
> that.

Sean: perhaps it's because you're an SCO employee (or at least you were the
last I knew, and I've seen postings from seanf@sco.com within the past
week).  Now, it's your business whether you post from sco.com or kithrup.
com, but I think some folks on the net are going to expect above-average
intellectual honesty on issues like this.  Don't you think that if *I* (not
J. Random Netposter, but a netperson from ISC) posted "Get ISC", I'd get
flamed too?

Look, I could have posted a reply as rcd@raven.eklektix.com, but even
though raven's been around for quite a while as an independent entity, I
don't think that would have convinced anyone.  For my part, I don't mind
you rah-rahing for SCO.  (You guys need all the help you can get!!:-):-)
Just be overt about it.
-- 
Dick Dunn     rcd@ico.isc.com -or- ico!rcd       Boulder, CO   (303)449-2870
   ...But is it art?