Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!samsung!umich!sharkey!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,fido.unix
Subject: Re: Equinox question
Message-ID: <1991Feb18.210449.19859@nstar.rn.com>
Date: 18 Feb 91 21:04:49 GMT
References: <27B79130.5C72@telly.on.ca> <1991Feb13.170319.13308@virtech.uucp> <1991Feb15.165755.3231@pcserver2.naitc.com>
Organization: Northern Star Communications, Limited
Lines: 16

kdenning@pcserver2.naitc.com (Karl Denninger) writes:

>>That is correct.

>See my post on this subject.  It's plain wrong.

Ok, it's wrong unless you want to tie up 2 ports for every
one port that you desire hardware flow control on --

So in reality, a 12 port board yields 6 ports with hardware
flow control -- 

-- 
   Larry Snyder, NSTAR Public Access Unix 219-289-0287 (HST/PEP/V.32/v.42bis)
                        regional UUCP mapping coordinator 
               {larry@nstar.rn.com, ..!uunet!nstar.rn.com!larry}