Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!cert.sei.cmu.edu!krvw
From: LCHICAIZ@ANDESCOL.BITNET (Luis B. Chicaiza S.)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: non-sacaning anti-virus techniques
Message-ID: <0008.9102151914.AA09165@ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 14 Feb 91 19:33:32 GMT
Sender: Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
Lines: 14
Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu

> 99% of scanning for viruses just requieres looking for a "search string".

What happens with new viruses?

I belive that is more useful to prevent virus contamination than try
to clean a system when it's infected.  I have a new anti-virus
product, (named COMPUCILINA), this program vaccinate other programs
(aplication ones, system programs, and a disk boot), and guarantees
these programs will not be infected.  COMPUCILINA offers protection
agaist actual and future viruses.

Luis B. Chicaiza S.
Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia.
mail adress: <LCHICAIZ@ANDESCOL.BITNET>