Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!sbcs!sbpmt!altman
From: altman@sbpmt.cs.sunysb.edu (Jeff Altman)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Win 3.0 vs 3.0a
Message-ID: <1991Feb17.180251.29508@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
Date: 17 Feb 91 18:02:51 GMT
References: <10827@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> <12453.27bbbff1@ecs.umass.edu>
Sender: usenet@sbcs.sunysb.edu (Usenet poster)
Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook
Lines: 17

3.0a fixed some bugs: UAEs in low memory situations when 
running with NetBios compatible networks.

A network bug with File Manager that would cause the 
Novell network to disconnect.

I have now been using 3.0a for a few months and can't say
that I have noticed much difference.  I have seen a greater
improvement in reliability of Windows since running the 
Norton Calibrate on my harddrive.  (* Supposedly there is 
a timing problem on 55sx 60meg machines.  This causes an
extra wait state to be added on some disk accesses which 
then causes Windows to crash *)


--
- Jeff (jaltman@ccmail.sunysb.edu)