Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!ico!ism.isc.com!emisle!dvb
From: dvb@emisle.uucp (David Van Beveren)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Xt and Motif file locations
Message-ID: <1991Feb16.073211.3821@emisle.uucp>
Date: 16 Feb 91 07:32:11 GMT
References: <1991Feb15.155945.14428@linus.mitre.org>
Reply-To: dvb@emisle.UUCP (David Van Beveren)
Organization: Emerald Isle Systems, Ltd. Agoura Hills, CA
Lines: 29

In article <1991Feb15.155945.14428@linus.mitre.org> bcotton@cyclone.mitre.org (R. T. Cotton) writes:
>
>The sun4 that I am working on have several different windowing enviroments setup on it.  Motif, Sunview, OpenWindows, Openlook etc.. When I run some 
>application such as xclock I get errors such as :
>Warning: Widget class VendorShell version mismatch (recompilation needed):
>  widget 11004 vs. intrinsics 11003.
>Warning: Widget class Clock version mismatch (recompilation needed):
>  widget 11004 vs. intrinsics 11003.
>
>My LD_LIBRARY_PATH us set to /usr/openwin/lib:/usr/lib/X11
>when I set it to /usr/lib/X11:/usr/openwin/lib these errors go away
>(at least for xclock) 
>
I have a similar setup on a sparcstation. MIT X11R4 and OpenWindows are
both on the same machine. OpenWindows is 2.0, which I thought was built from
X11R4. What I think is happening here is that there is some shareable lib
that has the X11R3 intrinsics in it. I know of no X11R3 libs on our
system. Must I be wrong? 

similar problem: on a DECstation, new os (4.0?) we recently started getting
widget 7001 vs. intrinsics 11003.
I assume that this is a decwindows version of the same problem. Please if
anybody can confirm or deny this, and give a concrete explaination of what is
happening, at least two people will be happy.

-- 
David Van Beveren                           INTERNET: emisle!dvb@ism.isc.com
EIS ltd. Professional Software Services     UUCP:   ..uunet!emisle!dvb
voice: (818) 587-1247