Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!mcdphx!citek.mcdphx.mot.com!hbg6
From: hbg6@citek.mcdphx.mot.com
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re:Forest Mims and Sci. American
Message-ID: <14588@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com>
Date: 18 Feb 91 03:11:00 GMT
Sender: listen@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com
Reply-To: hbg6@citek.mcdphx.mot.com
Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, Tempe, Az.
Lines: 17
Summary:
Expires:
References:<1991Feb17.054158.17772@swbatl.sbc.com>
Sender:
Followup-To:
Distribution:na

In article <1991Feb17.054158.17772@swbatl.sbc.com> adams@swbatl.sbc.com (Tom Adams - 235-7459) writes:
>There is some reference in this months Modern Electronics to some
>controversy regarding Forest Mims and Scientific American.  
>The letter refers to Mims' religous beliefs, editorial
>policy at Scientific American, and an earlier editorial in
>Modern Electronics.  Is someone familar with this matter and
>willing to provide more details?
>-- 

I seem to remember something about his belief in creation ( as opposed
to evolution ) causing some major league conflict. I'll try to look up
the exact article.

BTW: I have never really understood this debate. I always figured the
'Big Guy' just created evolution. Works for me.

John