Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!ccu.umanitoba.ca!herald.usask.ca!alberta!ubc-cs!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnews!military
From: ptm@jake.tmc.edu (Peter T. Murphy)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: Warrent vs. regular officers.
Message-ID: <1991Feb13.222558.7362@cbnews.att.com>
Date: 13 Feb 91 22:25:58 GMT
References: <1991Feb9.033425.4606@cbnews.att.com> <1991Feb12.015621.11055@cbnews.att.com>
Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker)
Organization: Wayne State University, Detroit
Lines: 15
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: ptm@jake.tmc.edu (Peter T. Murphy)
    The most current instruction that I've seen in the Navy concerning 
Warrents notes
that there are no W-1s being made in the Navy at this time.  People go 
from E6 to CWO-2.

   The insignia of warrent officers differs between the braches of 
service.  A recent
poster offered a Hypercard stack of rank insignia, which shows the 
differences in	warrent insignia.

  The best part of being a warrent is that you have most of the 
privileges of a commission and most of the responsibility of an enlisted.