Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnews!military From: swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Steve Williams) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Questions (Carriers & Corps) Message-ID: <1991Feb21.025948.11001@cbnews.att.com> Date: 21 Feb 91 02:59:48 GMT References: <1991Feb20.052409.29442@cbnews.att.com> Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker) Organization: David Taylor Research Center, Bethesda, MD Lines: 47 Approved: military@att.att.com From: swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Steve Williams) >Of all the Aircraft Carrier's in the US arsenal, which is considerred >the most capable? If I am not mistaken, some years ago, it would have been >the John F. Kennedy "Super Carrier". Exactly what do you mean by "most capable"? If you're talking about endurance, then it is the Nimitz class carriers (USS NIMITZ, USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, USS CARL VINSON, USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT, AND USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN). They all are nuclear powered carriers and can cruise for 13 years without "refueling," or estimated 800,000 to 1,000,000 miles. By comparison, conventional carriers need to be refueled every few days, depending on how fast they are cruising. Nuclear powered carriers can cruise at maximum speed constantly whereas conventional carriers could not; hence nuclear powered carriers could get to combat areas faster. However, like the conventional carriers, the nuclear powered carriers do need replenishment (e.g. restocking food pantry & aviation part shelves, refilling aviation fuel tanks, etc.) at time intervals. If you're talking about the attack capability, I guess there is not much difference among the carriers, if there are any - it depends mainly on the number and type of plane the carrier has. For example, if carrier A has more attack planes than carrier B, then carrier A has more attack capability. Carrier Full Load Aircrafts Complement ------------------- ----------- --------- ---------- NIMITZ class 91,487 tons 90+ 6,300 ENTERPRISE 90,970 tons 90 approx. 5,500 KITTY HAWK class: KITTY HAWK 81,123 tons 85 approx. 4,950 CONSTELLATION 81,773 tons " " " AMERICA 79,724 tons " " " JOHN F. KENNEDY 80,941 tons " " " FORRESTAL class: FORRESTAL 79,250 tons 70 approx. 6,180 SARATOGA 80,383 tons " " " RANGER 81,163 tons " " " INDEPENDENCE 80,643 tons " " " MIDWAY class: MIDWAY 64,002 tons 75 approx. 4,502 CORAL SEA 65,241 tons " " 4,974 Source: Jane's Fighting Ships 1985-86