Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!bbn.com From: tdonahue@bbn.com (Tim Donahue) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Marginal cache (Was: 64bits: Area Overhead and Opportunity Costs) Message-ID: <62981@bbn.BBN.COM> Date: 26 Feb 91 20:17:20 GMT References: <7967@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <46046@mips.mips.COM> Sender: news@bbn.com Reply-To: tdonahue@bbn.com (Tim Donahue) Organization: BBN Advanced Computers, Inc. Lines: 24 In-reply-to: mash@mips.COM (John Mashey) In article <46046@mips.mips.COM>, mash@mips (John Mashey) writes: > >... >Now, the caches together are about 14% also, so maybe we could have >doubled one of the caches, which would have been nice. >... OK, John, given the perceived market for the R4000, if you had to choose which cache to double in size, which would you choose, and why? >-john mashey DISCLAIMER: Cheers, Tim Timothy P. Donahue Operating Systems Development Group BBN Advanced Computers, Inc. 10 Fawcett Street Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 873-6000 tdonahue@bbn.com -- Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com