Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!netcom!gandrews
From: gandrews@netcom.COM (Greg Andrews)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Problems between T2500 and Hayes V series modems?
Summary: T1600 'unhappy' with PEP tones?
Message-ID: <25352@netcom.COM>
Date: 23 Feb 91 16:18:52 GMT
References: <25116@netcom.COM> <EBERSMAN.91Feb22104930@cfmartin.uu.net> <22621@hydra.gatech.EDU>
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  UNIX System {408 241-9760 guest}
Lines: 17

In article <22621@hydra.gatech.EDU> gs26@prism.gatech.EDU 
(Glenn R. Stone) writes:
>
>My T1600's are much happier when they don't have to wade thru PEP to
>get to the V.?? negotiation.... 
>

What do you mean by 'happier'?  The T1600 was specifically designed to
NOT be confused by PEP answer tones and any preceeding V.25 answer tone.  
I've made many calls from a T1600 to a T2500 and the T1600 always stops 
its own V.32 response tone when the PEP answer sequence appears.  When 
the real V.32 tones appear, the T1600 links up no sweat.

-- 
.-------------------------------------------.
| Greg Andrews      |   gandrews@netcom.COM |
`-------------------------------------------'