Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!hayes!tnixon From: tnixon@hayes.uucp Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Practical Peripherals 9600 ROM version 1.29 Message-ID: <3791.27c25401@hayes.uucp> Date: 20 Feb 91 10:48:33 GMT References: <4142@orbit.cts.com> <24586@netcom.COM> <39430@cup.portal.com> Organization: Hayes Microcomputer Products, Norcross, GA Lines: 31 In article <39430@cup.portal.com>, schuster@cup.portal.com (Michael Alan Schuster) writes: >>Being a radio enthusiast, it's hard for me to expect too much from >>a high-speed modem without _ANY_ RF shielding, and no grounding. It took >>me a couple days to keep the VHF packet station from driving it nuts! > > Oh, Gawd! both my ATI and USR modems have the main board practically encased > in metal (or plasticized foil). NO shielding! Is there an FCC Class "-A" > certification? I'm quite certain the PP9600SA is FCC Part 15 Class B certified for use in residential areas. It is _not_ always necessary to have sheilding to pass Part 15, since Part 15 regulates _emission_ of electromagnetic interference! It is possible to properly design the modem so that separate metallic sheilding isn't necessary. Part 15 doesn't, however, regulate at all whether or not the product will be affected by outside interference coming INTO the modem; that's left entirely up to the product designer. I may be wrong (I haven't seen the inside of a PP9600SA myself), but if you look at the inside of the plastic case, you'll probably find that it is dull gray color. This would be metallicized paint, which IS shielding. It's not necessary to have foil or metal parts to keep the modem from emitting interference. -- Toby Nixon, Principal Engineer | Voice +1-404-840-9200 Telex 151243420 Hayes Microcomputer Products Inc. | Fax +1-404-447-0178 CIS 70271,404 P.O. Box 105203 | UUCP uunet!hayes!tnixon AT&T !tnixon Atlanta, Georgia 30348 USA | Internet hayes!tnixon@uunet.uu.net