Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!decwrl!world!wmm
From: wmm@world.std.com (William M Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Whar exactly is the 1.2 "void (*) ()" problem?
Message-ID: <1991Feb25.203344.3217@world.std.com>
Date: 25 Feb 91 20:33:44 GMT
References: <DrCARROW.91Feb25124057@excalibur.itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Lines: 12

In article <DrCARROW.91Feb25124057@excalibur.itd.nrl.navy.mil> carrow@itd.nrl.navy.mil writes:
>/*
> *This is not necessary for 2.0 since 2.0 has corrected the void (*) () problem
> */
>
>OK, what exactly is the "void (*) ()" problem, and how can I get around it,
>given that I am stuck with ccxx? Any help appreciated.

I don't know what this problem was, but lest anyone get the wrong impression,
"ccxx" has been shipping with version 2.0 for a number of months.

-- William M. Miller, Glockenspiel, Ltd.