Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!ames!dftsrv!mimsy!ra!carrow From: carrow@itd.nrl.navy.mil (Steven A. Carrow) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Whar exactly is the 1.2 "void (*) ()" problem? Message-ID: Date: 26 Feb 91 14:41:36 GMT References: <1991Feb25.203344.3217@world.std.com> Lines: 13 In-reply-to: wmm@world.std.com's message of 25 Feb 91 20:33:44 GMT My apologies to Mr. Miller and Glockenspiel. I did not mean to imply that ccxx was only up to 1.2, only that we only have 1.2. Steve -- ***************************************************************************** * Steven A Carrow * ARPA: carrow@itd.nrl.navy.mil * * Code 5570 * UUCP: {backbone}!uunet! * * Naval Research Lab * nrl-css!carrow (I think) * * Washington, DC 20375 * Disclaimer: I can barely speak for * * (202) 767-9125 * myself, much less the government. * *****************************************************************************