Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!abvax!iccgcc!browns
From: browns@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com (Stan Brown)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Printing plural forms.
Message-ID: <3404.27c905aa@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>
Date: 25 Feb 91 17:40:10 GMT
References: <1991Feb19.104810.549@ZYX.SE> <3331.27c23984@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>
Followup-To: comp.lang.misc
Lines: 26

> In article <1991Feb19.104810.549@ZYX.SE>, arndt@zyx.ZYX.SE (Arndt Jonasson) writes:
>> We all have seen and, in various degrees, been irritated by texts such
>> as:
>> 	1 files were copied
>> when it should have been:
>> 	1 file was copied
>> 
>> I'd like to know: when programming, how do you avoid such errors? 

In article <3331.27c23984@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>, 
I stuck my coding pencil in my ear:
>      printf("%d error%s copied\n", nfiles, nfiles?"s were":" was");
> or
>      printf("files copied: %d\n", nfiles);

Several persons emailed to point out one or more of the the obvious errors
in the first one.  I would correct it to
       printf("%d file%s copied\n", nfiles, nfiles=1?" was":"s were");
This assumes that "0 files were copied" is correct.  For that reason, and
because it's less susceptible to bonehead errors like mine, I prefer the
second form, which gives "files copied: 0", "files copied: 1", "files
copied: 2".

Hey--this is all my opinion, nobody else's. Rely on it at your peril.
                                   email: browns@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cleveland, Ohio, USA    +1 216 371 0043