Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!ncr-sd!serene!telesys!akix!aki From: aki@akix.uucp (Aki Atoji) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Stroking thick lines about arcs Message-ID: <1991Feb24.012318.11018@akix.uucp> Date: 24 Feb 91 01:23:18 GMT References: <1991Feb20.161757.24206@motcad.portal.com> Organization: CxS Systems Lines: 36 jtc@motcad.portal.com (J.T. Conklin) writes: >I have been observing that stroking an arc with a ``thick'' line results >in some areas of white peeking through the line --- especially about the >outside perimeter --- on two independant PostScript implementation. Which two PostScript were these? [.. stuff deleted..] >I would be interested to know if this prints without white specks in the >circle on a real Adobe Interpreter. I handed this info off to PS people here at Talaris to see if we get the same results on Talaris printers with PostScript emulatioin. The resulting page had no white specks. I'd be interested to know what the outcome on true Adobe would be as well. On the related topic of compatibility, if Adobe does white specks on thick arcs or any other peculiarities not in the blue/red/black book, what should be the correct implementation for non-Adobe people who writes PostScript implementation? How should 100% adobe compatibility defined anyways? 100% conformance to the book? Or 100% emulation of Adobe postscript itself if they differ? > --jtc >-- >J.T. Conklin jtc@motcad.portal.com, ...!portal!motcad!jtc --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aki Atoji {ncr-sd,ucsd}!serene!akix!aki aki@akix.uucp {nosc,ucsd,hplabs!hp-sdd}!crash!telesys!akix!aki --------------------------------------------------------------------------- My employer doesn't know I speak. Therefore I don't speak for my employer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------