Xref: utzoo news.groups:28049 comp.os.msdos.misc:1237
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!pacbell.com!decwrl!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!spot!rja7m
From: rja7m@spot.cs.Virginia.EDU (Ran Atkinson)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: CFD:  comp.os.msdos.dv
Message-ID: <1991Feb21.175417.19815@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Date: 21 Feb 91 17:54:17 GMT
References: <04~&8`*@rpi.edu>
Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: University of Virginia
Lines: 12

"comp.os.msdos.dv" is far too cryptic a name.  The name needs to be
immediately obvious to naive first-time USENET users.

"comp.windows.dv" is similarly too cryptic.

Something like one of these would be better:
  comp.os.desqview		(it has an API and fits nicely here)
  comp.windows.desqview

The name in the proposal needs to be clear and less cryptic.
Desqview is itself as much of an OS as MSDOS is, so it might
fit better as its own node under comp.os.*