Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!ATHENA.MIT.EDU!wdc From: wdc@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Cattey) Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.andrew Subject: GNU emacs compatibility. Message-ID: Date: 26 Feb 91 21:30:21 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 15 I have made a survey of the differences between GNU emacs and ez. I have a compatibility package, which I am offering to CMU as contributed software. Most of the changes change key bindings. Alas, I have become like all other right thinking people and use CMU style transpose chars. Contrary to popular belief, I did not write emulation of MIT style transpose. Should I post the (somewhat long) survey of the differences between GNU Emacs and ez? This tells the differences down to where the cursor is when you're done with the command... -wdc Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com