Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!shlump.nac.dec.com!e2big.mko.dec.com!decabo.enet.dec.com!maximo.enet.dec.com!ajf
From: ajf@maximo.enet.dec.com (Adam J Felson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION ON NEW GROUP
Message-ID: <1991Feb26.210735@maximo.enet.dec.com>
Date: 27 Feb 91 04:07:35 GMT
References: <16890@accuvax.nwu.edu> <16859@accuvax.nwu.edu> <6420@idunno.Princeton.EDU> <70889@microsoft.UUCP>
Sender: news@decabo.enet.dec.com
Reply-To: ajf@maximo.enet.dec.com (Adam J Felson)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 22

In article <16890@accuvax.nwu.edu>, kaufman@delta.eecs.nwu.edu (Michael L.
Kaufman) writes:
::
::In article <70889@microsoft.UUCP> alonzo@microsoft.UUCP (Alonzo GARIEPY)
writes:
::>6.  The issue of splitting of a new HP48 group will and should only be
::>    resolved by a vote.  The sooner the vote, the sooner we can stop the
::>    discussion.  My recommendation would be to vote on the establishment 
::>    of a new group called comp.sys.hp48.
::
::I second this.  I would object to (and vote no to) a new group called 
::comp.sys.hp because it would cause a lot of non-48 people to suffer.  On the
::other hand, comp.sys.hp48 (or comp.sys.hp2848) seems to me to be a very good
::idea.  
::
::Michael
::
Actually how about comp.sys.handhelds.hp?  


 
__a__d__a__m__