Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!olivea!oliveb!veritas!amdcad!brahms!phil
From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: LEGALITY OF SELLING SOFTWARE
Message-ID: <1991Feb22.171604.17811@amd.com>
Date: 22 Feb 91 17:16:04 GMT
References: <1991Feb17.132821.12965@anomaly.SBS.COM> <1991Feb18.211413.9429@qualcomm.com> <1991Feb21.012733.22624@amd.com> <1991Feb21.203519.27969@qualcomm.com>
Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Lines: 19

rdippold@maui.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold) writes:
>The difference being that I don't have to carry around that stupid little card
>and have it in my posession when I use the software just to satisfy MS!  This
>means a _great_ deal.

Good grief! Do you really think MS is going to come to your house and
demand you produce the card? It is a metaphor, just like Borland's book
analogy.

By the way, I can't believe the way some people try to twist what
should be simple. One person told me in mail that Borland's book
analogy means that since you can take a book apart, photocopy it and
distribute the copies, you can also make copies of Borland software
and distribute them.

:-(

--
Save water! Use disposable diapers.