Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!emory!rsiatl!nanovx!msa3b!torre From: torre@msa3b.UUCP (Patrick Torre) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: Borland C++ Message-ID: <1539@msa3b.UUCP> Date: 21 Feb 91 19:17:06 GMT References: <6843@mace.cc.purdue.edu> <540@shuksan.UUCP> <1642@hsi.hsi.com> Organization: Dun and Bradstreet Software, Inc., Atlanta, GA Lines: 22 robind@code3.com (Robin Dunn) writes: >(No flames please, this is just an observation...) >You have had the use of a good C++ compiler for the last six months, >isn't that worth the $125? If not, then perhaps you shouldn't have >gotten it at all! Or would you have perferred that Borland not >release anything until they were ready to release this version? What >about until the next? perhaps if they had waited until TC++ was "ready" we would all be happier. Turbo C++ is still full of bugs and now there is another version? ,to which we should "upgrade"? anything to make money.... -- Patrick Torre @ Dun and Bradstreet Software, Inc (404) 239-2061 {emory,gatech}!nanovx!msa3b!torre