Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!timbuk!cs.umn.edu!quest!orbit!pnet51!johnston From: johnston@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Jon Johnston) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: State-of-the-art platforms Message-ID: <4041@orbit.cts.com> Date: 7 Feb 91 04:45:06 GMT Sender: news@orbit.cts.com Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN. Lines: 39 Well, first of all with a Macintosh you won't run into the device driver/memory problem that you did with a DOS machine. Chances are, if you choose something with a Unix base, it's going to be expensive, and also hard to configure. I would suggest a Macintosh, whatever Mac, the faster the better (obviously... an Fx, if you want), and using a 4th Dimension application. There are plent of applications avaiable in 4D for doing the office automation, and the compiler recently released by 4D will help with speed You can write externals for 4th Dimension, so you could possibly tie them to the video disc, the CD-ROM, communications, etc. Due to the release of the new packages such as 4D Write, 4D Calc, you can do a lot of processing with 4D, but tie it all back into the database. You could probably do a lot of this with Hypercard and XCMDs, also, a lot of ties to video discs and such already exist, there are database add-ons available (Hyper-Hit, although I confess I've never used this and don't know how well it works.) The choice of the two depends upon whether or not you'd like to base everything in a database, or in Hypercard. Well, that's my two cents.......... good luck. let us know what you choose. jon johnston UUCP: {amdahl!bungia, crash}!orbit!pnet51!johnston ARPA: crash!orbit!pnet51!johnston@nosc.mil INET: johnston@pnet51.orb.mn.org America Online:Biggity Someday, after we have mastered the winds, CompuServe:75470,1740 the tides and gravity, we shall harness for God the energies of love. Then, for the second time in the history of the world man will have discovered fire. Tielhard de Chardin