Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!wuarchive!psuvax1!news From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: NeXT Computers Message-ID: Date: 11 Feb 91 15:15:25 GMT References: <7515@crash.cts.com> Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet) Organization: Penn State Computer Science Lines: 18 In-Reply-To: djm@pro-odyssey.cts.com's message of 11 Feb 91 11:36:37 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: client6.cs.psu.edu In article <7515@crash.cts.com> djm@pro-odyssey.cts.com (David McDowell) writes: I'm not all that familiar with the NeXT so I casually picked up NeXT WORLD. I just would like to know why would someone put out $5000 to get a "low-end" NeXT with a 105MB hard drive that has a "trimmed down" operating system taking up 70MB of it! Also, the NeXT would be a much better machine if anyone produced software for it that people had heard of (aside from Lotus). I'm not saying down with NeXT and Macintosh forever, but, let's see a really good Macintosh emulator and a lighter monitor (70 pounds!!!!) and a "real" OS (70 megabytes!!!!????) and then we'll see if it's worth the 5000. Please read some of my previous postings. You obviously need to read more about the NeXT. Unfortunately, I'm getting tired of writing about it. You guys just keep coming. -Mike