Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!pfkeb
From: pfkeb@ebnextk.SLAC.Stanford.EDU (Paul Kunz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: 030/040 Duality?
Message-ID: <PFKEB.91Feb22211453@ebnextk.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 23 Feb 91 05:14:53 GMT
References: <1991Feb22.034020.24127@cbnewsl.att.com> <5337@media-lab.MEDIA.MIT.EDU>
Sender: news@unixhub.SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Lines: 11
Nntp-Posting-Host: ebnextk.slac.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: lacsap@plethora.media.mit.edu's message of 22 Feb 91 17:04:58 GMT


   Too bad if we can't keep the '030 board and run it inside the same Cube.
What I would do  with it is to let it run my printer.   Then, when
someone does complex graphics  printing on my machine, I wouldn't be
so slowed down.   Even with the 2.0 I have, which lowered the priority
of the printing processes, I still suffer when someone on my network
prints to my machine.

P.S.

This is not my idea.    Someone suggested it to me today, I forget who.


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com