Xref: utzoo comp.sys.next:13205 comp.lang.postscript:7691 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!udel!haven!wam!wor.umd.edu!mikec From: mikec@wor.umd.edu (Michael D. Callaghan) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next,comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Font Directory Printing Message-ID: <1991Feb23.140214.13628@wam.umd.edu> Date: 23 Feb 91 14:02:14 GMT References: <1991Feb19.034200.27969@wam.umd.edu> <1991Feb22.183856.1400@shaman.com> Sender: usenet@wam.umd.edu (USENET Posting) Organization: University of Maryland at College Park Lines: 24 In article <1991Feb22.183856.1400@shaman.com> jiro@shaman.com (Jiro Nakamura) writes: >In article gessel@ilium.cs.swarthmore.edu (Daniel Mark Gessel) writes: >> >>I've seen it mentioned before (here I think) that the Display >>Postscript Interpreter on the NeXT is about PostScript level 1.5. That >>is, it implements many of the features of level 2 (binary encoding, >>display postscript, color extensions, etc), but _not all_. > > BZZZZ. Sorry. My 2.0 Release has a PostScript version of 2.0.45.8. (This >is Workspace Version 217, System Release 2.0). So it does indeed appear >that the postscript version is level 2.0. Well, my PostScript version on my NeXT says the same thing. That doesn't alter the fact that it refuses to deal with Level 2 PostScript operators. Apparently, it is NOT Level 2 PostScript, but VERSION 2 of whatever level Adobe decided to use in NeXTStep. MikeC -- _________________________________________________________ Michael D. Callaghan, MDC Designs, University of Maryland mikec@wam.umd.edu Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com