Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!ccu.umanitoba.ca!herald.usask.ca!alberta!ubc-cs!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!mintaka!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!samsung!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!phobos.cis.ksu.edu!craig From: craig@phobos.cis.ksu.edu (Stuart A Craig ) Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell Subject: Re: Lantastic Message-ID: Date: 21 Feb 91 18:24:39 GMT References: <5233@tekfdi.FDI.TEK.COM> Sender: news@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu (The News Guru) Organization: Kansas State University Lines: 17 wood@Software.Mitel.COM (Dale Wood) writes: >In article <5233@tekfdi.FDI.TEK.COM> michaels@tekfdi.FDI.TEK.COM (Michael D. Smith) writes: >> Lantastic system is far better than Novell. > > since this is what our "expert" recommends. But I don't > > feel right about just taking his advice since he is obviously > > biased and because the Lantastic system will cost alot more. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Says who? Lantastic systems are usuallyu much less that a compariable Novel setup. - Stuart Craig internet: craig@phobos.cis.ksu.edu bitnet: sac@ksuvm Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com